![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Much like our first interview guest Nick Redfern, as another fellow Brit, Nick Pope seemed like the
obvious choice for our next interview. I grew up watching his numerous
appearances on the BBC and Sky TV, so it was very exciting when he
quickly agreed to do an interview. In a field littered with colourful
characters making incredible claims, here was a chance to interview a real government insider. Here we go...
Richard: First things first, thank you very much for giving us the time
to answer these questions, I truly appreciate it and I'm sure our
readers will find whatever you have to say (or not say) very
interesting.
Perhaps the most interesting case you have been associated
with is that of the 1980 Rendlesham Forest incident in Suffolk,
England. Jacques Vallee has suggested that this may have been some kind of psyop, pointing out that the American soldiers who went out to
investigate the UFO that night were told to leave their guns behind.
What do you think of this theory?
Nick Pope: As much as I respect Jacques Vallee, the psyop theory is
extremely unlikely to explain the Rendlesham Forest incident. I worked
at the Ministry of Defence for 21 years. One of my jobs involved
working closely with the Defence Intelligence Staff, while my final
post was in a security-related job. If this had been a psyop, there is
absolutely no way that the authorities would have allowed a paper trail
to be generated in the way that it was. The affair would have been
allowed to play itself out, but the moment people started putting
things in writing, those running the psyop would have had a quiet word
and stopped anything from being committed to paper. Any documents had
had slipped through the net would have been quietly withdrawn.
Richard: The other major case you are associated with is the 1993
Cosford incident. Do you think this or any other major cases in the UK
(e.g. the 1974 Berwyn Mountain Incident) could be explained by black projects in our skies, British or otherwise?
Nick Pope: For obvious reasons, the issue of black projects isn't
something that I can discuss in any great detail. Clearly there are
aircraft and Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (both experimental and
operational) the existence of which are not yet public knowledge.
However, there are ways of eliminating this possibility from any
official investigation into a UFO sighting. To give one example, we
know where we test fly our own experimental craft (in various special
ranges and danger areas), so can take this into account.
Richard: In other interviews I have heard you say that, during your
time on the MoDs UFO project, you never had any indication that there
was some secret UFO group - an MJ UK if you will - operating above you.
However, what about in other countries. Did you ever get any hint of
any secret UFO groups (of whatever scale) active abroad, not just in
the US but anywhere?
Nick Pope: It's certainly true that I never got any indication that
there was any clandestine UFO group operating in the UK, having access
to material that was somehow being withheld from me and my colleagues
in the Defence Intelligence Staff. So far as the situation in other
countries is concerned, I must answer "no comment."
Richard: You yourself have compared the MoDs UFO project to the US Air
Force's defunct Project Blue Book. It is widely believed in Ufology
that Blue Book was, far from a serious attempt to investigate UFOs,
simply a PR exercise aimed at debunking UFOs in the eyes of the public.
Hypothetically, if a UFO had crashed somewhere in the UK (during your
tenure at the MoD UFO desk) do you think you would have been told?
Perhaps more interestingly who do you suspect would have been?
Nick Pope: Firstly, I disagree with the view that Project Blue Book was
a PR exercise. While it had its faults and was, on occasion,
conclusion-led, I think that generally speaking most of those involved
did their best to investigate sightings in an open-minded way. While
they found no evidence that UFOs were extraterrestrial in origin the
fact that they couldn't explain a sizeable percentage of reports shows
they weren't debunking the phenomenon. The MoD's investigative efforts
mirrored Blue Book in relation to both terms of reference and
methodology.
In relation to a UFO crash, I believe that as the SME (Subject Matter
Expert) I would have been told. I would then have briefed up the chain of command to Service Chiefs and Defence Ministers. A key priority
would have been to bring in MoD scientists, to ensure there was no
biological or chemical hazard.
Richard: We've been having something of a new UFO wave in the UK
recently. In an interview with The Sun, you went as far as calling for
an official inquiry into the sightings over Shropshire. Is this still
your position or has it changed in hindsight? Also, what's your take on
the recent Police helicopter UFO sighting near Cardiff, Wales?
Nick Pope: My call for a public inquiry was not the result of a single
sighting, but a response to the wave of sightings over the
UK this
summer, coupled with unprecedented media and public interest. Some
sightings have clearly been caused by Chinese lanterns, but the MoD
appear to be using this as an excuse not to investigate. It would be
simple to ensure that witnesses are interviewed, photos and videos
analysed and radar tapes checked, yet these basic things are not
happening. This is why we need an inquiry. Whatever one believes about
UFOs, cases such as the incident involving the police helicipter show
that there are air safety issues involved.
Richard: Out of all the recently declassified British UFO files, what
is the most interesting to you?
Nick Pope: A few cases spring to mind:
26th April 1984: Members of the public report a UFO in Stanmore. Two
police officers attend the scene, witness the craft and sketch it.
13th October 1984: a saucer-shaped UFO is seen from Waterloo Bridge in
London by numerous witnesses.
11th September 1985: 2 UFOs tracked on a military radar system
travelling 10 nautical miles in 12 seconds.
4th September 1986: a UFO passes an estimated 1.5 nautical miles from
the port side of a commercial aircraft.
The National Archives asked me to review the files prior to their
release and pick out cases of potential interest to the media and the
public. These are some of the cases I selected.
Richard: Other than those we've already discussed are there any other
UFO cases you are particularly impressed with and if so, why?
Nick Pope: As you'd expect, given my background, I tend to be more
interested in cases involving the military and cases where visual
sightings are corroborated by radar evidence. Other cases that spring
to mind include the sightings over Belgium in 1989 and 1990, where
F-16s were scrambled; the RAF Lakenheath/RAF Bentwaters radar/visual
cases from August 1956; the 1995 near-miss between a UFO and an
aircraft on approach to Manchester Airport; Captain Zaghetti’s Sighting
from 1991 – another near-miss between a UFO and a civil aircraft; a
case from November 1990 involving RAF pilots sighting a UFO over the
North Sea, with other sightings and unusual radar returns across
Europe; all the cases featured on the Coalition for Freedom of
Information's website; and finally, some cases that I can't discuss
until MoD releases the files, over the course of the next 3 years.
Richard: What do you think the future of the MoD UFO desk will be, in
your December interview for BoA:Audio you said it would almost
certainly be shut down soon?
Nick Pope: I'm reasonably sure that the MoD will formally disengage
from the UFO issue. They may well do this once they finish the process
of releasing the archive of UFO files in about three year's time, but
they may well do so before then. They will probably justify this by
reference to the US experience and Project Condign. That said, one
does not have to have a formal UFO project to look at the phenomenon:
any sightings from civil and military pilots are still likely to be
investigated and any unusual radar returns will be examined. But
inevitably, a lot of potentially interesting cases (i.e. those
involving the public) will no longer be looked at.
Richard: Abductions: what are your thoughts on them? Do you think
something physically real, metaphysical, psychological or a combination
of these is happening? Is there any particular case that you find most
compelling?
Nick Pope: Just as the UFO phenomenon has no single explanation, I
believe there are various different explanations for the alien
abduction phenomenon. Some cases will be hoaxes and some may be
attributable to some form of hallucination or delusion. To this we can
probably add vivid dreams, sleep paralysis, false memory syndrome and
various other factors. However, this doesn't explain all the cases and
I suspect there's some other factor at work here. Scientific studies
of the abductees show no evidence of psychopathology or falsehood and
suggest that in recalling their experiences they exhibit physiological reactions (e.g. increased heart rate and perspiration) not seen in
control groups of non-abductees. My own case files on this run to
about 100 incidents. The most compelling involves a young woman called
Brigitte Grant (a pseudonym), who I worked with for a number of years.
There's some information about her on the internet, but she's dropped
out of ufology now and witness confidentiality precludes my saying
anything not already in the public domain.
Richard: I know that you've also shown an interest in ghosts, crop
circles and the cattle mutilation phenomenon, but what about other
esoteric subjects? Do you have any thoughts on the Yeti, Loch Ness
Monster or any other mysteries?
Nick Pope: I'm interested in the unexplained and the paranormal as a
whole. Inevitably, constraints on my time preclude my investigating
everything, but I've looked into and commentated on remote viewing, the
Bermuda Triangle and a whole host of other mysteries. Cryptozoology is
fascinating, though not my specialist subject. I keep an open mind on
all this.
Richard: I hear that pop star Robbie Williams is a big Nick Pope fan.
What do you think of this and has he ever contacted you?
Nick Pope: Robbie and I have exchanged a few emails over the last year
or so. I met him at the UFO Congress in Laughlin this year. He's a
nice guy and genuinely interested in the UFO phenomenon.
Richard: I always try and tie in Doctor Who to Richard's Room whenever
I can. You've written some excellent sci-fi books and seem to be a bit
of a fan, so what's your favourite Doctor Who monster and/or story and
why?
Nick Pope: As a successful sci-fi author myself I've been greatly
influenced by Doctor Who. The revival of the franchise has been
brilliant and stories such as Blink, The Girl in the Fireplace and The
Family of Blood have been phenomenal, in terms of script, acting, SFX
and direction. TV heaven. However, I'll always look back on Genesis
of the Daleks as the all-time classic story. I'd love to see this
remade or revisited in some way.
Richard: Thanks again, I look forward to any future media appearances,
books or articles.
Richard Thomas, BoA UK Correspondent and Columnist.
Contact Richard :: boxstacker(at)aol.com
|
Richard Thomas is also a columnist for Alien Worlds magazine. Check it out !